There is a major problem in todays UFO community. If an investigator has to GUESS as to what the witness may of seen, then the sightings must be classified as ''unknown''.
The witness may of seen....It seem quite likely the witness saw......
The witness probably saw .....It's possible the witness observed......
I am guessing the witness spotted.....The photo is probably a ....Blah Blah Blah
THIS IS GUESSING.... If an object cannot be properly identified, then the case has to be classified as ''unknown''. If a witness says they spotted a UFO and have a good photo of their encounter, then why do we tell them otherwise. Of course there are hoaxes and of course there are witnesses who are not the best observers but we have to approach a sighting as if it is the real thing. We use EXIF photo information to help spot hoaxers but its not full proof. The word of the witness is what we should center on. We have much more to gain by believing a witness than not believing the witness.
I feel we should be taking the next step in Ufology. We should be classifying some cases a I.A.C. Identified Alien Craft.....This is never done. You mean to tell me that there is not one case or photo that should be classified as I.A.C. I feel its time to update and overhaul the whole mess thats called Ufology.........
PLEASE E-MAIL ME AT NEWDISCOVERIES51@GMAIL.COM
SEND DONATIONS TO KEN PFEIFER 703 SWEDESBORO RD
MONROEVILLE NEW JERSEY 08343